TFF has developed a generic definition of RIL for the purpose of defining and standardizing the concept of RIL to all of it’s programs in the tropical regions of the world. This definition complete with generic criteria and indicators is now available the document, “Tropical Forest Foundation Standard for Reduced Impact Logging” formally published in June 2007.
The TFF Standard for RIL also describes a protocol for participation in TFF’s Forest-Market Linking Program as well as the use of the two product labels which TFF is now offering.
Since each country’s situation is completely different in terms of the forest condition, geography, soils, operating environment, and forest laws and regulation, the generic C&I have to be adapted to the country-specific situation.
In the Indonesia program, TFF has developed and field tested a comprehensive set of C & I which provide definition and implementation guidance for forest practitioners wishing to implement RIL. TFF now promotes the use of these C & I in the following ways:
Since threshold levels and outcome parameters are difficult to define objectively, many of the C & I contain proxy indicators which represent required activities to achieve the desired outcome.
A scoring and weighting system has been develop to provide a certain degree of objectivity and consistency in evaluating performance against the C & I.
This localized definition of RIL is referred to as the “RIL Performance Table for Indonesia”. To
download printable version Click
Here
| Principle |
Criterion |
Indicator |
V e r i f i e r |
| Reduced-Impact
Logging is being implemented as prescribed in the
TFF – “RIL Verified” |
| |
1. |
A pre-harvesting,
operational inventory has been conducted which
identifies all trees to be harvested and trees
to be protected according to the standards set
in the Indonesian TPTI (Tebang
Pilih Tanaman Indonesia / selective cutting
and planting system) or TPTJ (Tebang
Pilih Tanaman Jalur / Selective line cutting
and planting system) silvicultural and administrative
systems. |
| |
|
1.1 |
Field
visits verify that the inventory has been conducted
and that trees are labeled and numbered according
to regulatory requirements. |
| |
|
|
1.1.1 |
Spot checks should
be conducted periodically in multiple locations. |
| |
Auditor to insert observations and comments here. |
| |
|
1.2 |
The
Company has written standards for its cruising
activities including a clearly stated policy, on
which trees are suitable for inclusion in the inventory (see audit notes below). |
| |
|
1.3 |
Cruising
summaries (LHP) are available for the entire area
to be harvested. |
| |
|
1.4 |
Document check should verify that species protected by Indonesian law and CITES protocol are not included in the list of species proposed for harvesting. |
| Audit Notes |
A 100% inventory is mandatory for Indonesian forest concessions. Requirements and procedures for such an inventory is well documented by the Ministry of Forests (MoF) and available to all companies. MoF regulations detail the inventory, marking, mapping, and reporting procedures for commercial, protected, and future crop trees.
The regulation (SK) on minimum stocking standards for concession license and RKT renewal is not considered legitimate for RIL audit purposes as it is counterproductive to the goals of RIL and contains completely unimplementable expectations. |
| |
2. |
Operational
scale contour and tree position maps of adequate
accuracy, are available for the entire area to
be harvested annually. |
| |
|
2.1 |
The
company has acquired appropriate scale contour
maps through remote sensing methods or has adopted
suitable ground survey procedures to permit routine
contour and tree position mapping. |
| |
|
|
|
2.1.1 |
An appropriate
operational map scale is not greater than 1:5,000
with contour intervals of not more than 5 m. |
| |
|
|
|
2.1.2 |
Minimum information
content of the operational contour and tree position
maps includes all permanent and seasonal watercourses,
contours, roads (existing and planned), block boundaries,
physical features which could influence logging
planning, and the location of all trees suitable
for harvesting. |
| |
|
|
|
2.1.3 |
It is recommended
that systematic ground surveys leave behind a recognizable
survey grid which can be used for field orientation. |
| |
|
| |
|
2.2 |
Accuracy
of the maps must be adequate to permit accurate
planning of skid trails according to contours,
location of physical features (streams) and tree
location information. |
| |
|
|
|
2.2.1 |
Field checks will
verify accuracy of the map. Tree location should
be accurate within a radius of 20m. |
| Audit Notes |
Although contour mapping is recommended under MoF regulation, it is not an enforceable requirement. However, accurate contour maps play a much larger role in RIL planning than tree position maps, consequently, these indicators and verifiers are important preconditions to RIL implementation and should be subjected to significant audit scrutiny in the field. |
| |
3. |
Forest roads are planned, located, constructed, and maintained so as to minimize the impact on the forest and related values. |
| |
|
3.1 |
Company specific road standards have been developed to guide the planning, location, construction, maintenance, and deactivation of forest roads. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
3.2 |
Roads are located and constructed according to company standards. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
3.3 |
Road locations are routinely positioned on operational planning maps prior to commencement of logging planning and operations. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
3.4 |
Roads are maintained to minimize erosion. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
3.5 |
Roads no longer required for forest management activities, are deactivated so as to prevent erosion and to safeguard against unauthorized activities. |
| Audit Notes |
Technical guidance on roads is provided in the TFF “Planning, Location, Survey, Construction and Maintenance for Low Impact Forest Roads” |
| |
4. |
Harvesting
boundaries are established in the field and shown
on the maps according to existing regulatory requirements. |
| |
|
4.1 |
Procedures
for the establishment of logging boundaries are
clearly stated. |
| |
|
|
4.1.1 |
Random and representative
field checks verify the existence of operational
boundaries. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
4.2 |
Harvesting
boundaries do not conflict with or overlap with
protected area boundaries as identified on a higher
order plan, either inside or outside of the concession
boundary. |
| Audit Notes |
Boundary demarcation is required under MoF regulations. Procedures are prescribed by the MoF in detail. Both map and field checks will be required to verify compliance. |
| |
5. |
The company
is in possession of valid concession license and
a valid annual cutting permit (SK RKT) |
| |
|
|
5.1.1 |
A document check
verifies the existence of valid license documents |
| |
|
|
|
|
| Audit Notes |
Possession of a valid concession license and annual cutting permit are part of the legality standard and one of the main pre-conditions for participation in the “RIL verified” program. |
| |
6. |
Operational
scale harvesting plans are prepared showing how
the company proposes to carry out harvesting activities. |
| |
|
6.1 |
Harvesting
plans are prepared on the contour and tree position
maps. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
6.2 |
The
company has developed operational and environmental
standards to guide planning and logging activities |
| |
|
|
6.2.1 |
Operational standards include considerations for maximum gradient of skid trails, soil considerations, location of landings, organization (sub-compartmentalization) considerations, and stream crossing procedures |
| |
|
|
6.2.2 |
Environmental standards include a policy on maximum slope suitable for ground based logging, riparian buffer zones, stream crossing, considerations for landings, and considerations related to cultural aspects. |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
6.3 |
The
company has designated capable personnel responsible
for carrying out detailed logging planning. |
| |
|
|
6.3.1 |
Accurate plans
incorporating existing contour and tree position
information as well as planning standards, are
being routinely prepared. |
| |
|
|
|
|
Audit Notes |
This is an RIL requirement. The only MoF logging planning requirement is the division of the annual harvest area into +/-100 hectare blocks and the planning of the trucking roads two years prior to harvesting. However, the preparation of detailed harvest plans by competent personnel is a key element in the successful adoption of RIL practices. |
| |
7. |
Skid
trails and landings are located prior to the commencement
of felling activities in accordance with operational
and environmental standards. |
| |
|
7.1 |
The
company has designated capable personnel responsible
for carrying out detailed skid trail and landing
location. |
| |
|
|
7.1.1 |
Field checks confirm
that skid trails and landings are being routinely
located according to the logging plan and the standards
which have been specified. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
7.2 |
Updated
maps have been prepared showing actual location
of landings and skid trails where there is a variation
of the original plan. |
| Audit Notes |
Field checking is required to confirm compliance. |
| |
8. |
Skid
trails are opened prior to the commencement of
felling activities and in accordance with operational
and environmental standards. |
| |
|
8.1 |
The
purpose and procedure of opening up skid trails
is clearly communicated to operational supervisors
and personnel |
| |
|
|
8.1.1 |
Foremen in charge
of logging activities, have up-to-date and accurate
maps to guide the extraction activities |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
8.2 |
Simple
technical guidelines exist for opening the skid
trails. |
| |
|
|
8.2.1 |
Field checks confirm
that skid trails and landings are being routinely
opened prior to felling and that skid trails and
landings are built according to the specified standards. |
| |
|
|
|
|
| Audit Notes |
This is an RIL requirement which seeks to ensure that the benefits of detailed harvest planning is actually passed on to the operational stage. Experience has shown that opening of the skid trails progressively with the logging operation, does not work effectively in the tall timber and broken terrain conditions commonly found in Indonesia, consequently, opening of the planned and located skid trails prior to felling is an important step in the process of implementating an RIL system. |
| |
9. |
Felling
and bucking is carried out according to RIL principles
and guidelines. |
| |
|
9.1 |
Fallers
have been instructed on simple decision making
criteria to guide their efforts at directional
felling. This includes considerations for : personal
safety, alignment to skid trail, location of future
crop and protected trees, recoverability of the
felled tree, and minimizing felling breakage |
| |
|
|
|
9.1.1 |
Do the fallers
have a pocket sized card covering basic falling
and bucking considerations? |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
9.2 |
Fallers
are equipped with basic safety equipment and tools
appropriate for the implementation of directional
felling. |
| |
|
|
|
9.2.1 |
Fallers are supplied
with and use basic safety equipment (hardhats)
as well as appropriate felling aids such as felling
wedges? |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
9.3 |
The
company has a clear, written utilization policy
and bucking standards. This policy should specify
maximum tolerable defect, preferred log lengths,
and acceptable species. |
| |
|
|
|
|
| Audit Notes |
For additional technical details, the manual “Operational Considerations for RIL” should be consulted.: |
| |
10. |
Skidding
is carried out in such a way as to minimize soil
disturbance and damage to the residual stand. |
| |
|
10.1 |
The
company has issued operating instructions to tractor
operators which seek to ensure that machines remain
on the skid trails and maximize winching. |
| |
|
|
10.1.1 |
If the log is within
20 m of the skid trail, it should be extracted
using the winch only unless its position is such
that there is no clearance under the log for the
cable or if there is an obstacle which would prevent
direct winching. |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
10.2 |
The
tractor operator will not develop new skid trails
which are not marked in the field without consulting
with the foreman. |
| |
|
|
|
10.2.1 |
There is no evidence
of criss-crossing or duplicate skid trails. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Audit Notes |
This is an RIL requirement dealing with skidding. In the Dipterocarp forest, minimizing soil disturbance is the key to ensuring good regeneration. The forest floor usually has an abundance of seedlings. With the opening of the forest canopy, the existing regeneration grows aggressively. Soil disturbance not only implies destruction of poles and saplings, but also of the seedlings. Soil disturbance/displacement is the single most important factor affecting forest regeneration. |
| |
11. |
The
company has a clearly stated policy for deactivating
landings and skid trails aimed at minimizing the
risk of erosion. |
| |
|
11.1 |
Deactivation
guidelines for skid trails should specify how and
under what conditions cross-ditching will be done. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
11.2 |
Cross-ditching
of skid trails is a part of the tractor operator’s
normal job description. |
| |
|
|
|
11.2.1 |
Field checks verify
that cross-ditching and deactivation of landings
is done according to the company’s standards. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Audit Notes |
Field checks are required. Technical guidance is available in the manual, “Operational Considerations for RIL”. |
| |
12. |
Monitoring
and post-harvesting evaluation is being carried
out with the intention of providing continuous
self-evaluation and feed-back to the management
on the implementation of RIL practices. |
| |
|
12.1 |
Monitoring
and evaluation activities have been identified
as job descriptions and competent personnel have
been instructed to carry out these functions. |
| |
|
|
12.1.1 |
These duties may
be added on to the job description of the foreman
or new personnel may be appointed as ‘block
inspectors’. |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
12.2 |
Routine
field monitoring is carried out during the logging
activities to ensure that RIL objectives are being
achieved |
| |
|
12.3 |
A
post harvesting evaluation procedure has been adopted,
which assesses compliance with RIL objectives and
reports to management. |
| |
|
|
12.3.1 |
‘Block reports’ are
available. They should cover all aspects of the
logging and deactivation requirements and should
also report on utilization matters. An attached
map indicating the areas logged is desireable. |
| |
|
|
|
|
| Audit Notes |
Technical details are provided in the TFF publication, “Operational Considerations for RIL”. |
| |
13. |
Management
has put in place appropriate policies, instructions,
and personnel to ensure that all sectors of the
operation are clear on the need to modify practices
to make the adoption of RIL practices an operational
reality. |
| |
|
13.1 |
Company
policy and instructions to inventory, planning,
and operations personnel, state the objectives
of adopting RIL and clearly inform on individual
job responsibilities. |
| |
|
|
13.1.1 |
Policy statements
and/or standard operating procedures exist which
describe the various elements of the RIL system. |
| |
|
|
|
|
13.1.2 |
Job descriptions
exist which demonstrate the integration of function
and responsibility. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
13.2 |
Personnel
have been designated, trained, and adequately instructed
to ensure that all RIL activities are carried out
effectively. |
| |
|
|
|
|
| Audit Notes |
Guidelines for implementation are provided in the TFF manual, “Management Considerations for RIL”. |